Fulford Battlefield Research Website


Road plan
 Recording the events of September 1066
tanged arrow from Fulford
yorks releif map

The Fulford Tapestry Website

Prime Minister
Cabinet Secretary
Warning Councillors
Warning new cllrs
Responding to Persimmon
Persimmon 2014
Sustaining 'the story'
Democratic legitimacy
Eric Pickles MP
Minister of Transport
Developer letters 1
First objections
Old people's home
Planning cmte
Planning appln
Parliamentary Question
English Heritage
Behaviour complaint
Legal issues
Road plan
Planning objections
Cooperation rq
Peer review
Revised  study
York Chief exec
Permission 1
Permission 2
Appeal statement
Secretary of State
Minister's Call-in letter
Archeologist 5 2012
Objections 2012
CYC Chief Exec
CYC Chief exec
Freedom of Information
Baroness Andrews
The experts say

York City Planning documents online


YouTube videos


The Final Report

Finding Fulford cover

Kindle edition of Finding Fulford is now available

The Fulford Tapestry


Visiting Fulford

Map York


 This paper is attached to illustrate

  1. Need to give 3rd party access to specialist reports
  2. Legal requirement for applicant to be accurate in their claims
  3. Necessity for 3rd party papers to be deposited with the application

The relevance of the Fulford Road Corridor study to the Germany Beck proposed development.

This report, completed in September 1999, was not specifically looking at the possible impact of the Germany Beck proposal on the traffic on Fulford Road. However, in a short section, it makes several relevant comments and some predictions. All of the report's comments point to problems the extra traffic will produce. The planning application however, makes the claim that increased traffic problems should "not be regarded as a ban to development". This report challenges that statement.

Indeed the Report's states in its conclusions:

"The Fulford Road Corridor has continued to experience significant traffic growth over the recent years, resulting in increasingly severe congestion, deteriorating conditions for pedestrians and cyclists, disruption to bus services and further degradation of environmental conditions.  Developments underway and planned will generate additional demand for movements to and along the corridor, increasing the need to develop a strategy…….." (14.2)

The report looks briefly at the likely impact of the development and states:

"Given the nature of the development (Germany Beck), predicted traffic generations are substantially higher in the PM peak period…… expected to increase by some 260 VPH (22%). South of Heslington Lane (i.e. near the proposed junction) they are predicted to increase by over 320 VPH (20%). (4..3.4)

It goes on to suggest that the flow along Heslington Lane will increase by 250 VPH (35%) as a result of the proposed development.

The report also notes that:

"Increases in traffic flows of the order predicted will have a significant impact on cyclists and pedestrians in the corridor and on the reliability of bus services" (4.3.8) The report confirms "that bus services along Fulford Road Corridor are subject to considerable delay and disruption due to congestion." (4.4.13)

Far from supporting the idea of an extra junction, the report looks at the benefits of closing the junction of Hesington Lane and Fulford Road.  Their modelling suggests that closure of Heslington Lane, despite an overall increase in vehicle mileage, mainly along the A64, "a net environmental gain would be expected." (6.5.3) This closure was not implemented but it is difficult not to conclude that the advice in this report was to reduce, rather than increase the number of junctions and traffic joining Fulford Road.

In the light of these expert opinions, it is hard to understand how the outline planning proposal can claim that adding the volume of traffic expected to Fulford Road will not cause very significant problems to existing commuters, public transport users, cyclists, pedestrians and the environment.  The expert evidence indicates that it would be a disaster.


1.        VPH = Vehicles per hour

2.        The figures in brackets are the references in the report from Colin Buchanan Partners.

3.        The brackets in the quotations and in italics have been added for clarity.

4.        The traffic flow forecasts were produced in the MVA report which has not been seen.

5.        The figures were surveyed in October 1998 during which various schemes have been introduced to improve the flow especially for buses, bikes and pedestrians.

6.        Since the survey, traffic volumes have continued to grow but no recent surveys have been located

7.        There were no survey points or queue analysis south of the Heslington Lane junction so some analysis in the report for the southern part of the corridor is based on times taken by buses. These figures lead them to note "… the lowest speeds are recorded south of Heslington Lane." (4.4.14)

Charles Jones    15 Jan 2002


Related sites Facebook  Twitter (@ helpsavefulford)        Visiting Fulford        Map York

The author of the content is Charles Jones - fulfordthing@gmail.com   Last updated April 2015

This site does not use any cookies - so nothing is knowingly installed on your computer when browsing