|
Home
Up
Prime Minister
Cabinet Secretary
Warning Councillors
Warning new cllrs
Responding to Persimmon
Persimmon 2014
Sustaining 'the story'
Democratic legitimacy
Eric Pickles MP
Minister of Transport
Developer letters 1
First objections
Old people's home
Planning cmte
Planning appln
Traffic
Parliamentary Question
English Heritage
Behaviour complaint
Inacuracies
Legal issues
Road plan
Planning objections
Cooperation rq
Peer review
Revised study
Mitigation
Impass
Credibility
York Chief exec
Permission 1
Permission 2
Appeal statement
Secretary of State
Minister's Call-in letter
Archeologist 5 2012
Objections 2012
CYC Chief Exec
CYC Chief exec
Freedom of Information
Baroness Andrews
The experts say
York City Planning documents online
YouTube videos
The Final Report
Kindle edition of Finding Fulford is now available
The Fulford Tapestry
Visiting Fulford
Map York
| |
Legal questions, anomalies and contentions at Fulford
Related to the proposed Germany Beck development
- Is there any redress against inaccuracies in the planning submissions?
- Can inconvenient papers, withdrawn by the developer, be considered?
- Do developers owe a duty of care to the law or community?
- Are the COYC responsible for the accuracy when checking any claims? If
not, who is responsible?
- Why is it not possible to demand access to the flooding and traffic
calculations under the freedom of information provisions?
- Can denial of access for research be legally portrayed as proof of
absence? (Logically, absence of proof is not proof of absence)
- What conditions must be fulfilled before matters can be referred to the
minister?
This was the list that I took to a number of meetings with officials and
raised in my opening statement at the Public Inquiry.
The sad fact is that there is no enforceable obligation on those presenting
evidence to tell the truth. |
